data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffa0a/ffa0a47e2ec6dc27680ff0e94671e82e416f544b" alt="Epson perfection v500 vs v600"
The 135 model supposedly offers an automatic feed tray, but doesn't include SilverFast and has only gotten negative reviews from what I can find.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20dce/20dcefb1434ddb46be39c2cfd72b2abf1f2a6412" alt="epson perfection v500 vs v600 epson perfection v500 vs v600"
The 120 model scans medium format film at a premium. If you want the best image quality, get a copy of SilverFast that offers multiple exposures. They are also small and compact, with a handy carrying case.Īs you pay more for these models, you get infrared dust removal for chromogenic films (C-41, E-6 and Kodachrome), and fancier versions of SilverFast. As others in this thread have noted, you're likely to get your best results for 35mm film from these. All of their under $1k scanners worth considering only scan 35mm film and use a manual feed tray. Plustek apparently offers great technical support for its hardware, but the software supplied by SilverFast is going to leave you on your own for most things. * One-frame-at-a-time film scanners like those sold by Plustek. Here's what I've found:įilm scanners on the market are divided into three categories:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35187/35187947050fe5f32f9a0b47e09189fce01f1c91" alt="epson perfection v500 vs v600 epson perfection v500 vs v600"
I decided on the V600, but not without a lot of research and some frustration.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffa0a/ffa0a47e2ec6dc27680ff0e94671e82e416f544b" alt="Epson perfection v500 vs v600"